In partnership with CBSSports.com
The place for discussion for Kansas athletics
The place to talk Kansas football and recruiting
The place for off topic discussion
You have no favorite boards.
Interesting article though I think the methodology is flawed. There has to be an assumption that a certain amount of winning should be done by each program along the lines of a replacement player, a wins above replacement value so to speak.
In that vein Self would do better. If we really wanted to do this right we would figure out what a theoretically average coach achieves. I think the best way to look at it is conference wins. I would look at it like this where the baseline is 8 wins and you get credit for any wins (conference and tourney) over 8 and get negative credit for winning less than 8 games. We can figure out what each coach earned as far as winning based on the total pool of money spent in the conference.
Conf. Wins Salary Wins $ Value Value +/-
KSU 8 $1,500,000 $8,484,889 $6,984,889
KU 9 $3,865,000 $9,545,500 $5,680,500
OSU 6 $1,725,000 $6,363,667 $4,638,667
ISU 4 $1,200,000 $4,242,444 $3,042,444
OU 3 $1,700,000 $3,181,833 $1,481,833
BU 1 $1,826,000 $1,060,611 -$765,389
UT -1 $2,475,000 -$1,060,611 -$3,535,611
TT -4 $300,000 -$4,242,444 -$4,542,444
WVU -2 $3,000,000 -$2,121,222 -$5,121,222
TCU -6 $1,500,000 -$6,363,667 -$7,863,667
This post was edited by BigJKU316 on 3/19/2013 at 3:24 PM
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports