-
Hawkbrand said...
I worry about his D. It looks like he is finally becoming the shooter Self has claimed he is, and he appears to able to run an offense the last few weeks. But I have no confidence in him guarding a Marcus Smart, Myck Kabongo, Pierre Jackson, etc. He did well tonight guarding that #2 for American who was his size and had inferior athleticism. But unfortunately most of the opponents the rest of the way will have bigger and more athletic guards.
-
AaronM said...
It was brilliant motivation for everyone it seems. Since that shenanigans about Young at point guard broke, Tharpe has improved his ball handling, Young has improved his ball handling, Releford has improved his ball handling, and heck, even WITHEY has improved his ball handling. Self is a freaking genius.
Tharpe's development from here will be interesting. It appears as thoug he's going to fit extremely well into what this team needs - a competent backup point guard who can shoot a little and isn't a walking turnover when he comes in - without being a liability defensively because he can guard the weakest small AND has Withey in the paint to erase a lot of mistakes (Craft wouldn't even attempt shots against Withey most of that game). After this year, however, I wonder how well he will fit into the rotation without a drastic improvement defensively. One of the reasons I think Frank Mason is going to play early and often next year is because he's far ahead of almost any freshmen defensively, and he's fairly comfortably ahead of Tharpe and Adams in his defensive intensity and ability, particularly on the ball. Tharpe's inability to guard the ball is going to become a problem for him without a serious shotblocker next year in my opinion.
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/WestCoastHwk247
-
WestCoastHawk said...
I think I somehow missed the Young as point guard shenanigans.
On Mason, I worry we're building him up too much. He'll still be a freshman, and a freshman that while "underrated" is still borderline top 100. Tharpe, for all his limits, will have 2 years of D-1 play under his belt.
-
Baumer said...
If Tharpe continues his development like he has there is no reason to believe he's not the starting pg at the beginning of next year. His defense and strength will continue to get better and a junior Tharpe will play over a true freshman Mason if I had to bet right now. It's not like Mason is this unbelievable get. He has holes too or he wouldn't be a fringe top 100 guy. He's actually ranked about how Tharpe was. Now as the season goes will see but experience at PG when the rest of the team is young will be important.
-
AaronM said...
Finally, I'm really growing tired of the "he's not even top 100" or "he was a top 10 recruit" stuff. Not all classes are the same, and comparing kids across classes based on ranking relative to guys in their class is just silly. The 2012 class was extremely weak, especially but not only at the top. The 2013 class is a monster class, and again, not just at the very top. But for comparison's sake, Ryan and I were chatting last night and basically concluded that at the very least, the Harrison twins, Wiggins, Randle, and Parker are each better than the top if the 2012 class. That doesn't even include Aaron Gordon, James Young, or Kasey Hill (a better player than prospect at this point) any of whom might also have been the top player in the 2012 class, or the fact that Noel reclassified (Wiggins was 2013, switched to 2014, and then switched back to 2013, while Noel was always 2013 until Kentucky convinced him otherwise). Kyle freaking Anderson is a slow, 6-6 forward who can't dunk and was 3rd in 2012. Just remember that when we talk about rankings, comparing 82nd in one class to 82nd in another doesn't mean much.
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/WestCoastHwk247
-
Tralfaz said...
I really think at this point Tharpe will be starting and he'll be backed up by Frankcamp.
The problem with next season is we're not going to see te kind of defense we're used to. No matter how much talent the incoming freshmen will be bringing in they're not ging to play defense anywhere near the level of this years team, or last years team, or the year before...
TRUST IN COACH BILL SELF
-
WestCoastHawk said...
I think you're undervaluing rankings. Of course 82 v. 83 doesn't matter and 82 one year is different than 82 the next, but when you look at tiers they're quite valuable. Mason could be a smashing success, but to expect him to come in and be a major contributor as a freshman, while it would be great, would be the exception.
-
WestCoastHawk said...
I think you're undervaluing rankings. Of course 82 v. 83 doesn't matter and 82 one year is different than 82 the next, but when you look at tiers they're quite valuable. Mason could be a smashing success, but to expect him to come in and be a major contributor as a freshman, while it would be great, would be the exception.
-
AaronM said...
I'm probably just as guilty as anyone of pushing the expectations for Mason, but let's also remember that Tyshawn Taylor was rated in the 80s, entered with a similarly stacked class (though with almost no wings / guards), and joined a team that lost all five starters. Mason doesn't have to be better than the Harrison twins to see a lot of minutes at KU next year - he only has to be better than Adams to be in the rotation (and I'm quite certain he is), and he only has to be better than Tharpe to be in serious contention to start (and until two weeks ago, people were ready to run Tharpe out of the program). All evidence points to Mason exceeding the expectations of a typical 82nd ranked player, just like all evidence pointed to Ellis falling short of the expectations of a typical 25th ranked one.
-
bhamhawker said...
The big problem with Tharpe has always been that he's not a real PG. He's a shoot-first kid that has always played best in a ball-dominant way. He's turning into a serviceable backup, but I don't think he'll ever be consistent enough to run the team full time. His instincts are almost always for him to shoot before anything else, and I'm just not convinced yet that it will go away over time.
That being said, I think he's an ideal change-of-pace off the bench and it's working well in this dynamic because it allows Elijah to slide off the ball for an extended period of time.
I think one of the issues working against Tharpe is that while he's a good player, he's not good enough to be the type of player he is every game at Kansas. Tyshawn could get away with not being a real PG because he was such a phenomenal talent - Tharpe is not a phenomenal talent.
I think one of the reasons it's not ludicrous to expect Mason to play early and often is that he's exactly what Self's looking for in a PG - an athletic, tenacious defender that is a leader on the floor and a true PG. Next year, there's going to be more value in that for Self (I expect) than in having a shoot-first guard dominate the ball as a starter. The problem, then, is that Tharpe doesn't function well at all as an off-ball player - he has to play as a ballhandler working off pick\roll.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that a few too many fans get caught up in the numbers and the highlight videos and don't ask themselves how the rest of the team is going to fit together. What pieces does Self ideally want to have, and which players fit those roles the best? Next year is essentially going to be tabla rasa. Self can pick and choose who plays, because there will be almost no seniority. Perry Ellis and Jamari Traylor certainly aren't warranting guaranteed playing time, and Tharpe has been discussed above. The only guarantee is that Julius Randle, should he choose KU, starts immediately. Personally, I think Conner Frankamp and Brannen Greene will play a bit earlier and more often than Selden does, but that's more educated guess than anything at this point (as is all of our speculation, really).

Tharpe